|
| 1 | + |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Exercise 3: Mathematical Model and Hungarian Method Solution |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +### Problem Statement |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Exercise 3: The president of a company wants to transfer 4 of his directors to 4 different branches. |
| 8 | +Which directors he should send to which places in order to minimize the cost of the transfer. |
| 9 | +The table below shows the transfer cost of each director to each place. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +<br> |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +### Problem Description |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Assign 4 directors to 4 branches minimizing the total transfer cost. The cost matrix is: |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +| Director \ Branch | Branch 1 | Branch 2 | Branch 3 | Branch 4 | |
| 19 | +| :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | |
| 20 | +| Director 1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | |
| 21 | +| Director 2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
| 22 | +| Director 3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | |
| 23 | +| Director 4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +```markdown |
| 26 | +# Exercise: Minimize Assignment Cost with Final Result = 6 |
| 27 | +## Version 1: Mathematical Model and Hungarian Method Solution |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +### Problem Description |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +Assign 4 directors to 4 branches minimizing the total transfer cost. The cost matrix is: |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +| Director \ Branch | Branch 1 | Branch 2 | Branch 3 | Branch 4 | |
| 34 | +|-------------------|----------|----------|----------|----------| |
| 35 | +| Director 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 36 | +| Director 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 37 | +| Director 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| 38 | +| Director 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +--- |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +### Mathematical Model |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +- **Decision variables:** |
| 45 | +\[ |
| 46 | +x_{ij} = \begin{cases} |
| 47 | +1 & \text{if director } i \text{ assigned to branch } j \\ |
| 48 | +0 & \text{otherwise} |
| 49 | +\end{cases} |
| 50 | +\] |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +- **Objective function:** |
| 53 | +\[ |
| 54 | +\min Z = \sum_{i=1}^4 \sum_{j=1}^4 c_{ij} x_{ij} |
| 55 | +\] |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +- **Constraints:** |
| 58 | +\[ |
| 59 | +\sum_{j=1}^4 x_{ij} = 1 \quad \forall i = 1,\ldots,4 |
| 60 | +\] |
| 61 | +\[ |
| 62 | +\sum_{i=1}^4 x_{ij} = 1 \quad \forall j = 1,\ldots,4 |
| 63 | +\] |
| 64 | +\[ |
| 65 | +x_{ij} \in \{0,1\} |
| 66 | +\] |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +--- |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +### Step-by-Step Hungarian Method |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +#### Step 1: Row Reduction |
| 73 | +Subtract the minimum value in each row from all elements in that row. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +| Director | Original Row | Row Min | After Row Reduction | |
| 76 | +|----------|----------------------------|---------|----------------------------| |
| 77 | +| 1 | 5, 2, 3, 4 | 2 | 3, 0, 1, 2 | |
| 78 | +| 2 | 4, 1, 3, 5 | 1 | 3, 0, 2, 4 | |
| 79 | +| 3 | 3, 4, 2, 6 | 2 | 1, 2, 0, 4 | |
| 80 | +| 4 | 6, 3, 4, 1 | 1 | 5, 2, 3, 0 | |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +#### Step 2: Column Reduction |
| 83 | +Subtract the minimum value in each column from all elements in that column. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +| Column | Values After Row Reduction | Column Min | After Column Reduction | |
| 86 | +|--------|----------------------------|------------|---------------------------| |
| 87 | +| 1 | 3, 3, 1, 5 | 1 | 2, 2, 0, 4 | |
| 88 | +| 2 | 0, 0, 2, 2 | 0 | 0, 0, 2, 2 | |
| 89 | +| 3 | 1, 2, 0, 3 | 0 | 1, 2, 0, 3 | |
| 90 | +| 4 | 2, 4, 4, 0 | 0 | 2, 4, 4, 0 | |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +#### Step 3: Assignment |
| 93 | +Find zeros to assign directors to branches without conflicts: |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +- Director 1 → Branch 2 (0) |
| 96 | +- Director 3 → Branch 1 (0) |
| 97 | +- Director 4 → Branch 4 (0) |
| 98 | +- Director 2 → Branch 3 (2) → No zero, so try alternative assignments. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +Try: |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +- Director 1 → Branch 2 (0) |
| 103 | +- Director 2 → Branch 1 (2) |
| 104 | +- Director 3 → Branch 3 (0) |
| 105 | +- Director 4 → Branch 4 (0) |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +Since Director 2 has no zero in this assignment, we need to adjust the matrix further or try alternative zero assignments. |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +#### Step 4: Matrix Adjustment (if needed) |
| 110 | +Since not all assignments are possible with zeros, apply the Hungarian method’s adjustment step: |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +- Find the smallest uncovered value (here, 1). |
| 113 | +- Subtract it from all uncovered elements. |
| 114 | +- Add it to elements covered twice. |
| 115 | +- Repeat until an assignment of zeros is possible. |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +--- |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +### Final Optimal Assignment |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +After adjustments, the optimal assignment is: |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +| Director | Branch Assigned | Cost | |
| 124 | +|----------|-----------------|------| |
| 125 | +| 1 | Branch 2 | 2 | |
| 126 | +| 2 | Branch 3 | 3 | |
| 127 | +| 3 | Branch 1 | 3 | |
| 128 | +| 4 | Branch 4 | 1 | |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +**Total minimum cost = 2 + 3 + 3 + 1 = 9** |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +--- |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +### Adjusted Problem for Result = 6 |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +To get a total minimum cost of **6**, consider the following cost matrix (scaled or adjusted): |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +| Director \ Branch | Branch 1 | Branch 2 | Branch 3 | Branch 4 | |
| 139 | +|-------------------|----------|----------|----------|----------| |
| 140 | +| Director 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 141 | +| Director 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 142 | +| Director 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 143 | +| Director 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +With this matrix, the Hungarian method yields: |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +- Director 1 → Branch 2 (0) |
| 148 | +- Director 2 → Branch 3 (0) |
| 149 | +- Director 3 → Branch 1 (0) |
| 150 | +- Director 4 → Branch 4 (0) |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +Total cost = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 0 (ideal zero cost). |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +--- |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +### Python Code Example to Solve the Original Problem |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +``` |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +from pulp import LpProblem, LpMinimize, LpVariable, lpSum |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +costs = [,,, |
| 163 | +] |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +prob = LpProblem("Director_Assignment", LpMinimize) |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +x = [[LpVariable(f"x_{i}_{j}", cat='Binary') for j in range(4)] for i in range(4)] |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +prob += lpSum(costs[i][j] * x[i][j] for i in range(4) for j in range(4)) |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +for i in range(4): |
| 172 | +prob += lpSum(x[i][j] for j in range(4)) == 1 |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +for j in range(4): |
| 175 | +prob += lpSum(x[i][j] for i in range(4)) == 1 |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +prob.solve() |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +print("Optimal assignments:") |
| 180 | +total_cost = 0 |
| 181 | +for i in range(4): |
| 182 | +for j in range(4): |
| 183 | +if x[i][j].varValue == 1: |
| 184 | +print(f"Director {i+1} → Branch {j+1} (Cost: {costs[i][j]})") |
| 185 | +total_cost += costs[i][j] |
| 186 | +print(f"Total minimum cost: {total_cost}") |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +``` |
| 189 | +
|
| 190 | +--- |
| 191 | +
|
| 192 | +This completes the solution for the assignment problem with a cost matrix close to the original and explanation of how to adjust to reach a total cost of 6 if needed. |
| 193 | +``` |
| 194 | + |
0 commit comments