Fix unsafe stmt modifications in FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT

The following fixes path isolation changing the immediate use list of
an SSA name that is currently iterated over via FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT.
This happens when it duplicates a BB within this and creates/modifies
stmts that contain SSA uses of the name and calls update_stmt which
re-builds SSA operands, including removal of SSA uses and re-inserting
them.  This is not safe as that might cause missed iterated uses but
more importantly could cause the 'next' use to be removed.

For the case in question the fix is to collect interesting uses in
a vec and do the processing outside of the FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT
iteration.

	* gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.cc (check_loadstore): Set
	the volatile flag on the stmt manually.
	(find_implicit_erroneous_behavior): Move code transform
	outside of FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT iteration.

Author: rguenth

gcc/gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.cc

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ check_loadstore (gimple *stmt, tree op, tree, void *data)
     {
       TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (op) = 1;
       TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (op) = 1;
-      update_stmt (stmt);
+      gimple_set_has_volatile_ops (stmt, true);
       return true;
     }
   return false;
@@ -762,6 +762,7 @@ find_implicit_erroneous_behavior (void)
 
 	      /* We've got a NULL PHI argument.  Now see if the
  	         PHI's result is dereferenced within BB.  */
+	      auto_vec <gimple *, 4> uses_in_bb;
 	      FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, iter, lhs)
 	        {
 	          /* We only care about uses in BB.  Catching cases in
@@ -774,18 +775,23 @@ find_implicit_erroneous_behavior (void)
 		    ? gimple_location (use_stmt)
 		    : phi_arg_loc;
 
-		  if (stmt_uses_name_in_undefined_way (use_stmt, lhs, loc)
-		      && (duplicate || can_duplicate_block_p (bb)))
+		  if (stmt_uses_name_in_undefined_way (use_stmt, lhs, loc))
 		    {
-		      duplicate = isolate_path (bb, duplicate, e,
-						use_stmt, lhs, false);
-
-		      /* When we remove an incoming edge, we need to
-			 reprocess the Ith element.  */
-		      next_i = i;
-		      cfg_altered = true;
+		      if (!can_duplicate_block_p (bb))
+			break;
+		      uses_in_bb.safe_push (use_stmt);
 		    }
 		}
+	      for (gimple *use_stmt : uses_in_bb)
+		{
+		  duplicate = isolate_path (bb, duplicate, e,
+					    use_stmt, lhs, false);
+
+		  /* When we remove an incoming edge, we need to
+		     reprocess the Ith element.  */
+		  next_i = i;
+		  cfg_altered = true;
+		}
 	    }
 	}
     }