dist: bump rustup version to v1.29.0
#4513
Open
+259
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
PS: I understand that this version is not final, but any suggestion regarding the wording/phrasing/format of the changelog is greatly appreciated :) |
djc
reviewed
Oct 6, 2025
rami3l
force-pushed
the
dist/release-1-29.0
branch
4 times, most recently
from
bcc97ee to
ac5c68f
Compare
rami3l
force-pushed
the
dist/release-1-29.0
branch
3 times, most recently
from
19f4ecb to
b418650
Compare
rami3l
force-pushed
the
dist/release-1-29.0
branch
from
b418650 to
7856171
Compare
Member
Author
|
@ChrisDenton Would you mind having a look? Many thanks in advance :) |
rami3l
force-pushed
the
dist/release-1-29.0
branch
from
7856171 to
a736027
Compare
ChrisDenton
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2025
Member
ChrisDenton
left a comment
ChrisDenton
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wording looks good to me.
djc
reviewed
Dec 9, 2025
Comment on lines
+16
to
+18
| - You can use the `RUSTUP_CONCURRENT_DOWNLOADS` environment variable to | ||
| adjust the number of concurrent downloads to better reflect the needs of | ||
| your specific environment. Particularly, you may set the value to `1` to |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggest we mention the default value here?
|
|
||
| - `rustup check` will check for toolchain updates concurrently. [pr#4388] | ||
|
|
||
| - `rustup update` and `rustup toolchain` subcommands will download toolchain |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel like this is more important/a bigger win for most usage than the rustup check changes, and so merits moving up?
Comment on lines
+21
to
+28
| - `rustup update` and `rustup toolchain` subcommands will unpack components | ||
| of a toolchain while others are being downloaded. [pr#4471] [pr#4605] | ||
|
|
||
| - `rustup` now uses `indicatif`-based progress bars for toolchain update | ||
| checks and downloads. This provides not only a more async-friendly UI solution, | ||
| but also a more consistent and visually appealing experience for various | ||
| commands like `rustup check`, `rustup update`, and `rustup toolchain install`. | ||
| [pr#4388] [pr#4426] |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It feels like these are really all part of the same improvement in experience, and I don't think it makes sense to have separate bullet points from the user's point of view.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the 1st PR for the
1.29.0beta release according to our release process.Checklist
Draft the release blog post.(Not required, since this is a beta release.)