Skip to content

Conversation

@mehmetoguzderin
Copy link
Contributor

There are stable arm64 binaries for CUDA. However, the URL handles the difference for architecture, so this PR adjusts accordingly as devcontainers otherwise work really well on arm64 systems. The number of supported configurations is small, and I was able to build well with available versions locally.

"installCudnn": true,
"installCudnnDev": true,
"installNvtx": true,
"installToolkit": true,
"cudaVersion": "12.2",
"cudnnVersion": "9.4.0.58"

@mehmetoguzderin mehmetoguzderin requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2024 03:41
@mehmetoguzderin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@mehmetoguzderin mehmetoguzderin changed the title Support arm64 for CUDA image Support arm64 for CUDA feature Oct 23, 2024
@mehmetoguzderin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eljog Is there anything that I can do to make it easier to enable workflows for this PR & potentially get a review? It unblocks using the CUDA feature on arm64 devices. Thanks!

@mehmetoguzderin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is it possible to get a review for this PR? CLA is already meeting the requirements. Would be good to have this work fine especially with recent improvement of @Kaniska244 already in (merged to this branch, too).

@mehmetoguzderin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed merge conflict by adjusting version to 2204, same as features upstream. Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@Kaniska244 Kaniska244 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change looks fine, to be further reviewed by maintainers.

@AlvaroRausell AlvaroRausell enabled auto-merge (squash) July 10, 2025 12:35
@AlvaroRausell AlvaroRausell merged commit e3e3ed7 into devcontainers:main Jul 10, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants