Skip to content

Conversation

@shellmayr
Copy link
Member

  • Add docs for the user-based, granular replay permissions
  • Will only merge once the feature is shipped fully

Closes TET-1567

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 11, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
sentry-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Dec 17, 2025 0:24am
1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
develop-docs Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 17, 2025 0:24am

1. Have standard role/team/project permissions that would normally grant replay access
2. Be included in the replay allowlist

This means the allowlist adds an additional layer of access control without replacing your existing permission model. If the feature is disabled, only standard Sentry permissions apply.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it would be good to provide an example here?

For example, if a user doesn't have access to the project with replay data, adding them to the allowlist will not change this.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, a screenshot of the allowlist UI would also be helpful.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added an example here

@jas-kas
Copy link
Member

jas-kas commented Dec 11, 2025

Very thorough and easy-to-follow, great work!

Copy link
Contributor

@coolguyzone coolguyzone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants