-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Fix generic signatures for mixin forwarders conflicting type parameter names #24567
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
| final class Flow[In, Out]: | ||
| def collect[T](pf: PartialFunction[Out, T]): Flow[In, T] = ??? | ||
|
|
||
| object Flow: | ||
| def create[T](): Flow[T, T] = ??? | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| abstract class Message: | ||
| def asTextMessage: TextMessage | ||
|
|
||
| abstract class TextMessage extends Message | ||
|
|
||
| abstract class JavaPartialFunction[A, B] extends PartialFunction[A, B]: | ||
| @throws(classOf[Exception]) // required, compiles without annotation | ||
| def apply(x: A, isCheck: Boolean): B | ||
|
|
||
| final def isDefinedAt(x: A): Boolean = ??? | ||
| final override def apply(x: A): B = ??? | ||
| final override def applyOrElse[A1 <: A, B1 >: B](x: A1, default: A1 => B1): B1 = ??? | ||
|
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
| public class JavaTestServer { | ||
| public static Flow<Message, Message> greeter() { | ||
| return Flow.<Message>create() | ||
| .collect( | ||
| new JavaPartialFunction<Message, Message>() { | ||
| @Override | ||
| public Message apply(Message msg, boolean isCheck) throws Exception { | ||
| if (isCheck) throw new RuntimeException(); | ||
| else return handleTextMessage(msg.asTextMessage()); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static TextMessage handleTextMessage(TextMessage msg) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this enough? We should get the type parameters of all the enclosing classes.
The core of this issue has to do with substitution and the fact that we convert to String. I could substitute the enclosing of the enclosing class type parameters by something that will create conflicts (from a String point of view).
I would have suggested a more robust algorithm where we do a first pass to go over all the types referred to in the Signature and disambiguate if they have a different id but the same name (as a String).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ouch, you're right. For example,
Still have a generic signature attribute having a name clash.
IIUC, that's what this PR does (?), except it collects only a direct parent's type parameters though.
Do you mean, use more "robust" data structure than String for detect name shadowing? (but I feel like String is enough for detecting conflict at a String level in the end).
Anyway, I'll open the issue, and make it work for nested classes.